Remember Me     Forgot Login?   Sign up  

Share this article

greener journeys logoThis article has been republished with permission.  It originally appeared on the Greener Journeys website on 22nd April.  In view of yesterday's announcement, the first sentence presumably no longer holds true.

DEFRA is due this month to publish its new Air Quality Plan. Government has already lost two court cases on this issue, so the pressure is on.

Concern over air quality is no longer just the preserve of environmental groups and it is widely recognized that we are facing a public health emergency.  With air pollution causing 44,000 early deaths a year, the issue has attracted the attention of mainstream media, business, policy makers and the public at large.

Road transport is a major cause of the deteriorating air quality in our major cities, and rising sales of diesel cars are a big factor.  Diesel cars already contribute 40% to pollution.  And DfT tests of diesel cars last year found that almost all Britain’s most popular diesel cars exceeded limits for safe levels of pollution during on-road driving, with toxic NOx emissions up to 14 times higher than claimed.  Yet sales of diesel cars continue to rise with 244,000 more sold in March, a 1.6% increase on last year.

The cost in health and human terms is huge. The Royal College of Physicians have linked air pollution to cancer, asthma, strokes, heart disease, diabetes, obesity and dementia.  They have also estimated the cost of these health impacts to be £20 billion every year, and these impacts fall most heavily on the poorest.

The imperative to tackle poor air quality isn’t just a health issue, it is also a moral issue. Research by the University of Surrey shows that drivers commuting in diesel cars produce six times as much pollution as the average bus passenger, yet bus passengers suffer far more from pollution in our cities than those travelling in cars.  This is a clear violation of the core principle of environmental justice.  Those who contribute the most to air pollution in our cities are least likely to suffer.

The onus must be put on the polluters.  Unfortunately policy so far has failed to address these fundamental equity and social justice issues, and has crucially stopped short of tackling one of the biggest root causes of air pollution: increasing use of private diesel cars.  Moreover DEFRA’s exclusive focus so far on emissions per vehicle rather than emissions per passenger presents a distorted picture and provides insufficient foundation for effective policy interventions.

Any solution for poor air quality in our major cities must also tackle congestion.  Pollution is greatly exacerbated by congestion: emissions from vehicles increase by at least fourfold when they are stuck in traffic.  It follows that reducing private car use through modal switch to public transport, cycling and walking is essential.

Measures to encourage modal switch from car to bus can be transformative.  Research for Greener Journeys by Professor Peter White shows that bus priority measures can deliver 75% fewer emissions per bus passenger km than for car passengers.

Buses need to be recognized as an integral part of the solution.  Like all other parts of the transport network, the bus sector is under pressure to tackle the harmful emissions arising from its older diesel vehicles.  However, attention given by the media to these older buses can obscure the fact that modern diesel buses are a major success story.  Real world testing of the latest Euro VI diesel engines demonstrates a 95% reduction in NOx emissions compared with their older Euro V counterparts.

The rigorous testing regime for bus manufacturing means that an equivalent of the Volkswagen emissions testing scandal would be inconceivable in the bus sector. The car emissions scandals by contrast mean that the public at large have lost faith in manufacturers’ own claims.  The Mayor of London will launch independent monitoring of vehicle emissions later this year.

Much more needs to be done to tackle diesel cars.  The EFRA Select Committee, the Mayor of London, and many other leading voices have been calling for a national diesel scrappage scheme.  And research just published by Friends of the Earth shows that almost half of Britons back restrictions on polluting cars, with only 18% opposed. Perhaps with the increasing weight of evidence the pendulum will begin to swing, but with fuel duty now frozen for seven years running, it may take a lot to convince Government to take on the car lobby.

However, eventually the onus must be put on the polluters. We need evidence based research rather than policy based on political expediency, and we need a better understanding of the wider impacts of policies. Next month Greener Journeys will publish a new report by Professor David Begg which highlights the consequences of government policy. This research will examine the impact clean air zones will have on bus sector finances, and wider social and economic impacts.

We hope that DEFRA’s much anticipated new Air Quality Plan will tackle head on the issue of diesel cars, either via national scrappage scheme or restrictive measures. Government would also achieve maximum benefit quickly and cost effectively by providing support for bringing the rest of the bus fleet up to the Euro VI standard, through retrofit where feasible, and by encouraging modal switch from car to public transport, walking and cycling.

We all bear some responsibility for reducing air pollution; real change will only occur when everyone accepts this responsibility and makes a concerted effort. We need to act urgently to protect the health, well-being and sustainability of today’s communities and future generations.

- See more at:

Log in to comment

See also...

  • 01 June 2020

Campaigners reject waste authority's incinerator claims

Environmental groups have renewed calls for the North London Waste Authority (NLWA) to review its plans to build a huge new waste incinerator in Edmonton. A letter sent to councillors in seven boroughs contains detailed 'rebuttals' of claims made recently by NLWA board members in defence of the project. Their objections relate both to serious environmental concerns and to the project's value for money, especially in the light of changing circumstances. Read more

  • 26 May 2020

'A cry from the heart of Bowes'

Residents of streets to the south of Bowes Road, particularly those living in Brownlow Road, Warwick Road and nearby streets, have come together to launch a campaign to prevent traffic in the area building up to the unacceptably high levels that were normal prior to the Covid-19 lockdown. Their proposal is to create a low-traffic neighbourhood to prevent use of roads in the area as a cut-through. The campaign, under the slogan 'A Bus Gate for Brownlow?', has won the support of Better Streets for Enfield, who promote the idea of creating people-friendly streets across the entire borough. Read more

  • 06 May 2020

Towards a greener Broomfield Park

Throughout their existence, the Friends of Broomfield Park have been helping make the park 'green' in the modern environmental sense of the word. Last week they published a document outlining their work to date and what they are planning for the future. Also highlighted are the FoBP's community and educational roles. Read more

  • 15 April 2020

Council consultation on its Climate Action Plan

The Climate Action Plan published by Enfield Council in mid-March outlines measures designed to make the council carbon-neutral by 2030. However, only 11 per cent of borough-wide emissions are due to the council's own operations, the main sources are transport, housing and the industrial and commercial sector, and it is equally important to make these carbon-neutral too. The deadline for comments is looming - in view of the coronavirus crisis taking precedence, it should be extended. Read more