Remember Me     Forgot Login?   Sign up  

Share this article

Enfield Council's draft climate action plan is much too limited in scope, is taking far too long to be developed and put into action, is neglecting to engage citizens properly, and fails to identify opportunities for the borough's businesses. These are the conclusions of an analysis presented at the April meeting of the Enfield Climate Action Forum (EnCAF).

encaf logoEdited highlights of the EnCAF meeting, held online on 29th April, are now available on the GlobalNet21 YouTube channel (and above). As well as the analysis of the council's plans, presented by David Flint of Enfield Green Party, the meeting discussed waste management during the Coronavirus crisis, and how to hold public bodies accountable - with particular reference to the plans to build a huge new waste incinerator in Edmonton.

A policy aimed at the "wrong target"

David Flint's analysis of the council's climate action plan focussed its criticism on four important aspects:

  • Scope: The emissions that the plan aims to bring down to zero by 2030 account for only two per cent of total emissions in the borough, those that the council controls itself. All emissions in Enfield need to be reduced to zero, and the council should be using its regulatory powers and development powers to help make this happen.
  • Speed: "We call it a climate emergency for a reason, because it is very urgent that we get this done." The council has taken nine months just to produce a document, and "most of what's in the document that is specific could have been agreed within the first four weeks because almost everything was well known to anyone who'd been involved with climate change". Other councils, such as Lambeth and Wandsworth have produced detailed plans and are executing them.
  • Strategic positioning: "The council treats climate change as a problem and only as a problem, but it's also an opportunity, because what we're going to see over the next few years is a switch, in all sorts of respects, from a high carbon economy to a low-carbon economy and there is the possibility for councils that move now, for businesses that move now, to be able to get ahead of the game".
  • Public engagement: Solving the climate crisis needs the involvement of every councillor, every business, every citizen of the borough. The council should be giving the lead and involving everyone, but instead a small task force has been used, meeting in secret, not even accessible to other councillors, only issuing brief notes rather than proper minutes. "It's not just that it's wrong in democratic principle, it's also counterproductive. That is not the way that the council is going to get everyone involved, everyone understanding what has to be done."

On a more positive note, David Flint welcomed the proposal to make a commitment to reducing carbon emissions a mandatory part of all decision making by the council, as well as the suggestion of experimenting with a "carbon price".

Waste management

In the second edited extract, Cllr Vicki Pite briefed the meeting on discussions with council officers about problems with waste management during the Coronavirus lockdown. She herself was one of the people whose bins hadn't always been collected.

Lack of accountability

The third presentation included in the video was about lack of accountability of the North London Waste Authority. Georgia Elliot-Smith described coming up against a "wall of denial and rebuttals" when campaigning against the planned new incinerator - see this forum post to read the main points that she raised.

The importance of individual actions

Finally, Nia Stevens from the Enfield Climate Community Group spoke about the important role that individual actions can play in encouraging councils to take action against climate change.

Log in to comment

See also...

  • 01 June 2020

Campaigners reject waste authority's incinerator claims

Environmental groups have renewed calls for the North London Waste Authority (NLWA) to review its plans to build a huge new waste incinerator in Edmonton. A letter sent to councillors in seven boroughs contains detailed 'rebuttals' of claims made recently by NLWA board members in defence of the project. Their objections relate both to serious environmental concerns and to the project's value for money, especially in the light of changing circumstances. Read more

  • 06 May 2020

Towards a greener Broomfield Park

Throughout their existence, the Friends of Broomfield Park have been helping make the park 'green' in the modern environmental sense of the word. Last week they published a document outlining their work to date and what they are planning for the future. Also highlighted are the FoBP's community and educational roles. Read more