Remember Me     Forgot Login?   Sign up  

Share this article

cycle lanes in winchmore hillProtected cycle lanes, such as these in Winchmore Hill, have been shown to sharply reduce fatalities among all road users, not just cyclists

The most comprehensive study of bicycle and road safety to date finds that building safe facilities for cyclists is one of the biggest factors in road safety for everyone. Bicycling infrastructure -- specifically, separated and protected bike lanes -- leads to fewer fatalities and better road-safety outcomes for all road users.  The study shows that "roads are safer for motorists, pedestrians and cyclists in cities with robust bike facilities".

Researchers studied road safety statistics for 12 US cities over a 13-year period and found that protected bike lanes were associated with very high reductions in fatalities among all road users - not just among cyclists.  They cite reductions of fatalities ranging from 38.2 per cent to as much as 75 per cent.

"Bicycling seems inherently dangerous on its own," said study co-author Wesley Marshall, PhD, PE, assistant professor in the College of Engineering, Design and Computing at CU Denver. "So it would seem that a city with a lot of bicycling is more dangerous, but the opposite is true. Building safe facilities for cyclists turned out to be one of the biggest factors in road safety for everyone."

The study, published in the Journal of Transport & Health, found that bike facilities act as "calming" mechanisms on traffic, drivers become more aware of their surrounding, drive more slowly, and there is a consequent reduction in fatalities.

In the UK, 26,610 people were killed or seriously injured on the roads in the year to June 2018, the last period for which government statistics are available. Around one in 20 of those were cyclists.

Support for building more protected cycling infrastructure in the UK comes not just from organisations such as the London Cycling Campaign and its local branch, the Enfield Cycling Campaign, but also from London Living Streets, which works to improve conditions for pedestrians in the capital and - most significantly perhaps - from the AA, whose president, Edmund King, is quoted as saying "Our own extensive research shows that 84 per cent of drivers who cycle feel safest on dedicated cycle ways, hence we support calls for more cycle lanes. The fact that 65 per cent of drivers are still 'surprised when a cyclist appears from nowhere' – which obviously they don't – shows that they need to be more aware of their surroundings when driving at all times, and dedicated lanes would help."

 

Log in to comment

Neil Littman's Avatar
Neil Littman posted a reply #4569 06 Jun 2019 12:50
Don't think anyone would argue with the fact that protected cycle lanes provide a much higher level of safety but it doesn't alter the fact that Enfield Council did waste a lot of money on the various schemes particularly with the bus boarders which provide a lower level of safety for pedestrians, in particular those with disabilities and children in buggies and as a result this has put them in conflict with cyclists. They are two completely different subjects.
David Hughes's Avatar
David Hughes posted a reply #4578 07 Jun 2019 17:34
I'm not sure I fully understand Neil L's contribution, but I'm going to continue on the basis that 'bus boarders' are the raised platforms at the bus stops along the cycle lanes.

I ride along some or all of the cycle lanes on the A105 Green Lanes most days partly because my very aged legs and thighs cope best with cycling rather than walking; I cycle most local journeys . Inevitably I often arrive at a bus stop when people are waiting for a bus or actually boarding one. If they are waiting they mostly stay well-behind the cycle lane section and only occasionally have to step backwards to the pavement as I approach. As you would imagine kids sometimes leave it a bit late, but I have never had any sort of confrontation or pause in my progress.

If people are actually boarding I simply stop and wait or, if I spot the boarding well ahead and it's safe, I will sometimes move to the main carriageway and pass the bus there.

Just once have I seen a cyclist leave the cycle-lane section on a bus-boarder and swerve onto the pavement behind the bus stop. That could be very dangerous especially if children are in the queue, but it's no more dangerous than people miss-using pedestrian crossings. Everyday most of us accept some sort of risks on the roads.

As I understand it the Council looked hard and long at the design of bus stops. It was well done, and if it's not perfectly safe that's no different to any facet of a well-used highway. Indeed, I suspect that what lies behind any expressed fears has more to do with unhappiness about curtailed 'car-space' than increased risk. If so car drivers are going to have a hard time as action to reduce the dangers of poor air quality, climate-change and under-exercised residents take hold. The Government will be slow to act, but eventually it will have to.
Neil Littman's Avatar
Neil Littman posted a reply #4580 08 Jun 2019 12:42
David, you sound like a considerate cyclist to me. I'm afraid there are others who do not behave the way you do when approaching a bus stop. There was an article published recently elsewhere about issues that sight impaired people are having with the bus borders.

See also...

  • 11 May 2020

Government tells councils to reallocate roadspace for walking and cycling 'as swiftly as possible'

The government has told local authorities that it expects them to take urgent measures to reallocate roadspace away from cars to provide more room for walking and cycling 'as swiftly as possible, and in any event within weeks'. They are to include 'pop-up' cycle lanes with light segregation features, more school streets, lower speed limits, pedestrian and cycle zones that exclude motor traffic, low-traffic residential neighbourhoods, and bus and cycle corridors along key routes into town and city centres. Enfield Council's 'Streetspace Plan', announced last week, will incorporate measures of this sort - residents are able to upload their own suggestions on the council's Consultation Hub. Read more

  • 06 May 2020

Freeing up streetspace throughout London - including Enfield

Transport for London's Streetspace Programme, announced on Wednesday, is intended to rapidly transform the capital's streets to accommodate a possible ten-fold increase in cycling and five-fold increase in walking when lockdown restrictions are eased. Many boroughs have already started on their own similar schemes - Enfield's was announced on Tuesday. Measures of this kind have already been endorsed by the prime minister and business secretary. Read more

  • 28 April 2020

'We don't want or need to go back to those fume-filled, congested and hostile roads of the past'

'We don't want or need to go back to those fume-filled, congested and hostile roads of the past' - the message concluding a letter sent by campaigners to the leaders of Enfield Council concerned about what might happen once the coronavirus lockdown ends. They urge the leaders to to take steps to ensure that, as restrictions are gradually relaxed, high levels of car usage do not return, hindering social distancing and discouraging active travel modes - walking and cycling. Their suggestions include 'pop-up' cycle lanes along corridors for key workers, widening of pinchpoints that present hazards when walking or cycling, and re-allocation of road space at places where queues outside shops make it impossible for pedestrians to maintain safe distances. Read more

  • 27 November 2019

Council consulting on modifications to parking and loading arrangements along the A105

After assessing feedback received during the six month-long consultation period, Enfield Council is consulting on some minor modifications to the experimental traffic orders relating to parking and loading restrictions along the A105 adjacent to the cycle lanes. The modifications would provide additional parking and loading points in Green Lanes, Winchmore Hill, and in Village Road, Enfield. Read more

  • 04 April 2019

Report highlights failings in London road traffic justice

RoadPeace, the national charity for road crash victims, has today published a review looking at traffic law enforcement across London. Based on the latest statistics from 2017, the findings have led the charity to call for improved transparency and accountability of the Metropolitan Police, to understand the strategy it is deploying to tackle road danger. London should be leading the way when it comes to traffic law enforcement, and RoadPeace’s review indicates that enforcement is not only inconsistent and infrequent across the capital, but doesn’t compare well nationally either. Read more

  • 17 October 2018

Beware the Long Handlebars of the Law!

Last week the Metropolitan Police were on Bourne Hill and The Bourne to carry out an operation designed to dissuade drivers from failing to pay due care and attention to people riding bicycles. Clare Rodgers was with them and reports what happened. Read more